my favorite color is rust
sisters redux
Sometimes I just can't let go of an image. I know that someplace inside of the photo I took, there is a better image. In the case of Sisters, i knew that the real picture was located around the horses heads and the wonderfully contrasting light.
After allowing my thoughts to steep in my head for a couple days, I cropped the photo into a portrait aspect ratio instead of a landscape image. The photo now tells a different story, one that I prefer over the wider landscape shot.
What do you think? Is this an improvement?
uncomfortable mo
I have a friend named Mo. It is one of Mo's pleasures to create photographs that make the viewer uncomfortable. I don't know why, but then, I don't know why she is named Mo either. However, Mo's delight in uncomfortable images has gotten me thinking about this image that I took a couple weekends ago. It makes me uncomfortable.
I don't like to be uncomfortable looking at my own images. I tend to want my photos to embrace me with comfort. I want my eye to flow smoothly into the image and rest on the subject without any effort at all. I work hard to make that transition from reality to the image as smooth as possible.
After giving the photo some thought, I believe that what throws me off in this image is that the irrigation system recedes to the left, away from the center of the image, instead of towards the center of the image.
In this second image of the same irrigation system, I framed the photo so that the irrigation system recedes towards the center of the photo. I am much more comfortable with this image than the first. I also like the parallel lines formed by the edge of the road and the edge of the plowed field. Comfort and balance. Peace with the world.
I don't know which image is the better image from a technical standpoint. I don't really care. I do know that I prefer the comfort of a balanced image. Evidently, I don't want to work too hard when looking at a photo. I will leave that to Mo. Me? I am a lazy viewer.
the old masters
I am a huge fan of the old Dutch Masters. Their use of light and shadow is spectacular. Unlike others from the same time period, the Dutch Masters were more than willing to paint everyday people performing everyday activities. If we were to travel to France or Italy, during the same time, the subject matter would have been themes of religion or the very wealthy.
When I was given the assignment to create a self portrait, I knew exactly the style of image and the location that I wanted to use. So, I drove to the farm, where there is no electricity and I tried to recreate the light and feel of a Dutch Master painting.
What do you think? Did I succeed?
print!
I was reading Karen Walrond’s post on her blog Chookooloonks about how the demise of Kodak has her thinking about printed photos. Karen wonders if photo albums and printed pictures are disappearing. She asks if our kids think of photos as only temporary in nature. (BTW, if you ever want to meet a truly beautiful human being, inside and out, you should read Karen's blog on a regular basis.)
Karen’s well written thoughts have touched on an issue that has been on my mind for the last couple of years. What to do with all of the images that I create? How do I ensure that they are around for a long time? As a photographer, I see myself as part artist and part recorder of events, places, and people that are a part of my family’s life. In that sense, my images are important to me and hopefully to future generations of my family.
With film, we can count on the fact that we have printed images and negatives that are physical. A lighting strike is not likely to suddenly wipe out a lifetime worth of our photographic work when we have negatives and photos safely tucked away. I have many times, seen disaster survivors on television, holding with all of their might onto the family’s photo album. Sometimes they are shown picking through rubble, collecting framed photographs. These photos represent the precious memories of generations of friends and family. I know that if I were to wake up to find my home on fire, I would grab my family, my pets, and my photos… in that order. Everything else can be replaced. Not so with the photos.
In this age of digital photography, when every cell phone takes a decent picture, how do we safeguard our family’s collective memories? Certainly, we want to keep the electronic photo files safe and secure. We should save them on backup drives or in the “Cloud” as a form of insurance, in the event that something happens to our primary storage (probably our computer’s hard drive.) One power surge, lightning strike, or hardware failure won’t wipe us out if we have a solid back up policy.
However, having backups of our image files is only a short to medium term solution to the problem. What will we do when technology changes and hard drives and CD/DVD storage are no longer an option? Eventually they will go the way of the tape drive, floppies and zip drives. Keeping up with technology is going to forever be a thorn in the photographer’s side. Just around the corner, the next generation of computers won’t have hard drives or CD/DVD drives. Some computers have already replaced the hard drive with a solid state chip.
We can move to the cloud! Sure, store all of your images online and let some service provider worry about the back up of your images. You may already have your images stored on the cloud. Do you use Flikr? If you do, then you are using the cloud to store your photos. Actually, this is not a bad idea short to medium term. Long term, the cloud can be a problem, because eventually, you will no longer be around to pay the cloud service provider and your images will simply go away or you will lose access to them.
So what is the answer?
For me, the answer is to turn back the clock and forget about modern storage technology. I print my photos. Ok, I don’t print them all, but I do print the best of my images, the ones that I want to be around for a long time. I print my photos in two different formats. The first is the traditional photographic print. Sometimes, I use my own printer and sometimes I use a photo printing service. Once I print them, I place them in frames around the house or put them into a file for long term storage. When I get tired of looking at a framed photo, I simply replace the photo with a new one and reuse the frame.
Of course, with printed photos, you still have the ability to store them in photo albums. I don’t, but that is a personal choice of mine. If I had young children at home, I could see myself using photo albums as a fun project for the kids. They could be a great way for the kids to record their own memories.
The second print format for me is the printed photo book. I’ve written about creating photo books in the past. I think they are a fantastic way to share your best images with friends and family as well as a perfect means of long term storage. What is as long lasting as a book? Not many things are. I hope that generations from now, some child will get a thrill out of seeing a book filled with his great great-grandfather’s photographs.
Currently, I make photo books for many reasons. I print an annual “best of the Year” book. I create destination vacation books, ordering a copy for every family that participated. I also like to make special occasion books. My parents recently celebrated their 50th anniversary and I created a book to mark the momentous event, making copies for my parents, myself and my brother and sister.
The point of all of this is that you need to keep printing photographs. Don’t become lulled into thinking that keeping your memories on your computer or your phone means that they will be around forever. If you want your photos to be available for the next generation to enjoy…. Print them out.
Really… what are you waiting for? Go get started.
winter fog
This weekend was an odd one for winter weather. The temperatures rose to just above freezing and a chilly fog set in. We never saw the sun all weekend. It was really difficult even telling which direction the sun should have been.
I wanted to take some landscape pictures, but the fog forced me to rethink my approach. Now, I had to use the fog as part of the image composition.
Note that there are spots on the the image. Turns out that I had some dust on the camera's mirror. I should have noticed it when I changed the lenses, but didn't. These are easily removed in Photoshop. However, that is not always the case. Lesson learned; check your mirror as well as your lens… everytime you change lenses.
winter grass part two
As promised, where is the uncropped B&W conversion of the previous photo. I am torn between the two. I like the B&W conversion. I like it's OOC crop. However, I like the warmth of the bronze grass in the previous version. Perhaps the answer lies in between. What do you think? What is your favorite version?
winter grass part one
Sunday morning, just before dawn, I got up and drove over to the lake, hoping to shoot something interesting in the morning light. What I did not plan on was the frigid temperatures. The thermometer in my car registered only 1F. Too cold for a long walk. So, I drove around for a bit, looking for The Picture that I knew must be out there waiting on me.
As I made the turn for home, I spotted this grass, bronze in the predawn light. I quickly set up the camera and took four shots. Then I ran back to the car as fast as I could. I don't like this kind of cold at all.
Here, I've left the color and cropped to a 2×1 ratio. Tomorrow, I will show you the dame image converted to B&W and left at a 3×2 ratio.
Look at the two images and let me know which version you think is the best and why. That is your assignment… just give me your opinion. The hard part will be to put into words why you like the image you pick.
pictures of rob
These are two portrait images that although very soft, I like very much. I would like to shoot them again to get them sharper? Why are they so soft? Well, I was shooting in dim light at f1.8. Combine the narrow DOF that resulted with the wide open aperture along with the my struggle to focus in dim light and you have the perfect condisitons to produce the soft images you see.
Still, I am happy with the light and compositions. Next time around, I would shoot with a nnarrower aperture, lower ISO, and use a tripod.











